Just can't make up my mind yet whether to go for WD Blue or Black, or even perhaps Seagate Pro. Brilliant!ĭefinitely going to swap my 500GB SSD for a 1 or 2TB HDD though as soon as I can. No more worries about fragmentation, it's sped up the SSD by a noticeable amount and external HDDs even more. Glad I got it for free, glad I got it, period. Getting my license at the end of the week.Īt the same time am tempted to get rid of the (500Gig) SSD in the laptop anyway and swapping for a 1 or 2TB HDD - I need more space as have too many virtual hard disks for VMs which I have to keep swapping to/from a USB drive, and also dual-booting a Linux system plus, I can get a WD disk dirt cheap in a couple of months' time.Īnybody have any particular prefs for WD Blue or Black? Black seem much more hard-wearing, looking at the specs.ĭiskeeper's sweet - I'd even pay for it myself if I had to/could. That's why the current Diskeeper seems so attractive in preventing fragmention in the first place - and it's specially written for SSDs apparently. All the same, I defrag automatically once a week, more if the need arises. Of course, when you take into account the much reduced number of writes an SSD supports (over an HDD), that skews the equation a little bit. So, damned if you do, damned if you don't. OTOH, not defragging results in terribly fragmented files very quickly with (relatively) old-fashioned file systems like NTFS (the slightly later journaling type FSs are far less prone to it), which not only can slow down read and write speeds tremendously but also presents an increasing risk of damage to the file. It impacts on the total write ops the drive can reasonably be expected to sustain. Well, yes, just as bad as it is for HDDs. I always shied away from defraging ssd I always thought it was bad for them. Oh and it's also perfect for SSDs etc., which of course fragment just like any other storage medium. Just a volunteer Moderator, not connected to or affiliated with Winstep Software Technologies, and not an official part of customer service though I do try to help when and where I can if my scarce time permitsĪpparently has no neg impact on speeds and only pos one. The current included defragger does seem to do the job, but my confidence in it is low so I'm very much inclined to take up the offer of the spare seat. At least until XP (no idea if also later) MS used to license and include a cut-down, very basic version of Diskeeper with the OS. Oh and it's also perfect for SSDs etc., which of course fragment just like any other storage medium.Īs for MS implementing stuff previously provided by 3rd party s/w, yep, they certainly try. Apparently has no neg impact on speeds and only pos one. After that I lost track, but the current version has something new up its sleeve - it doesn't actually defrag after the event, it prevents fragmentation by forcing files to be written contiguously. Oh, Diskeeper Pro up to the XP versions was absolutely brilliant. The Windows defragger does a good enough job in the background (this is the issue with Microsoft implementing certain functionalities that were previously offered by 3rd party utilities into the OS - they're generally not very good, but because they are 'good enough' to most people, they end up killing the 3rd party utility anyway). These days, however, I only have a single HDD (all the rest are SSD/NVMe drives) and that one is only used for backup purposes. I used Diskeeper many years ago and I really liked it.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |